Sued. John Galliano Ordered to Pay William Klein For Copying Imagery. Second City Style Fashion Blog

April 20, 2007 • Fashion


Imitation is not always the sincerest form of flattery. Yesterday a Paris judge ordered fashion designer John Galliano to pay
American photographer William Klein €200,000 (US $271,000) in damages
for copying Klein’s work in spring ads for his secondary line.

Judge Claude Vallet said Galliano’s
advertisements too closely resembled Klein’s signature "painted
contacts" — oversized painted contact sheets streaked with stokes of
vivid color.

The five ads (which appeared in March in French Vogue and Elle
magazines, as well as several other publications in Britain and Russia) featured three enlarged contact print images of models, highlighted
with colored brushstrokes.

Vallet said the ads clearly violated intellectual property laws
because Galliano never asked Klein’s permission to use the style, which
the New York-born photographer developed more than a decade ago. He
ordered Galliano to pay for the verdict to be published in the
magazines in which the ads appeared.

A spokeswoman for Galliano said the
decision was being appealed. In the meantime, Galliano has pulled the plug on the
advertising campaign.

Sources: The International Herald Tribune & WWD



See the Top Ten Summer 2016 Trends for Women Over 40

One Response to Sued. John Galliano Ordered to Pay William Klein For Copying Imagery. Second City Style Fashion Blog

  1. srhcalifornia says: sued by affliction for bootleg and copyright infringement.
    Affliction, Inc. et al v. EMODA.COM Corporation et al
    Plaintiffs: Affliction, Inc. and Unique Special Tee, Inc.
    Defendants: EMODA.COM Corporation, Europe Moda, LLC., Marina Shulman, Daniel Kogan, Anama, LLC and DOES
    Case Number: 2:2008cv01642
    Filed: March 10, 2008
    Court: California Central District Court
    Office: Western Division – Los Angeles Office [ Court Info ]
    County: Alameda
    Presiding Judge: George H Wu
    Referring Judge: Patrick J. Walsh
    Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property – Copyrights
    Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
    Jurisdiction: Federal Question
    Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Leave a Reply